Nine and a half percent.
That is the share of American K–12 academic standards carrying any published cross-jurisdiction alignment—the connective tissue that makes an alignment claim checkable at all.
- 258,430Standards measured
- 9.5%Carry any published cross-jurisdiction alignment
- 20.1%Best-covered jurisdiction: Michigan
- 8Jurisdictions with none
- 38,590Standards across those eight jurisdictions for which a cross-jurisdiction alignment claim cannot be checked in either direction against a published alignment
SOURCE: LEARNING COMMONS KNOWLEDGE GRAPH v1.12.0 · ALL 52 US ACADEMIC JURISDICTIONS
THE EIGHT JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT A PUBLISHED CROSS-JURISDICTION ALIGNMENT IN THIS RELEASE
Indiana · South Carolina · Virginia · Alaska · Nebraska · Oklahoma · Arizona · Minnesota
The absence of a published alignment is not proof that two standards are unrelated. It means there is no published relationship against which the claim can be checked.
This is not a criticism of those standards, which are complete. It is a work list for the layer between them.
InterRealm presents this as the first published measurement of cross-jurisdiction alignment coverage across all 52 US academic jurisdictions.
Counting note: the full graph contains 283,381 nodes and 492,169 edges; this coverage analysis counts 258,430 academic standards, a subset of graph nodes.